»Prepare4Death [Factions Original]

Name of offender: Prepare4Death
Name of offence: accuseing of glitch
Server:Factions original
Date and time:1/27/16
Evidence:http://imgur.com/OgEnfVF
@Melon333 @eXDawnsaur @YoshiCake @Beloctic

 

not worth mute @YoshiCake why was i muted for the same exact reason ._. said same thing becuase i told someone they where
glitching into my base 12 hrs mute! yet he can get away with it? wtf please take care of this @Tenderman @Melon333 @CyrusTheVirus1

 

well what you want me to do??
I went asking for Asy help... @AsyFrost
And he told me it was not worth a mute...... so I did not take care of it...
now.... you dont believe me ??

 

I talked to @AsyFrost , so here is the in-depth explanation. What Prepare4Death said was past tense, so it doesn't really matter that much. The reason for the no accusing rule, is that if you accuse them of glitching, hacking, etc they may stop what they are doing and admins will not be able to ban. Prepare4Death said that he was trying to glitch in the past, meaning that he's not doing it at the time so any evidence to be collected of glitching is already gotten. You were muted I'm guessing because the guy you accused was in the process of glitching at the time. I hope this makes sense.

Example: "You were glitching yesterday" -Not muteable
"OMG This guy is glitching!! Admin TP!" -Muteable

 

You probably didn't get the point in it cause saying:
'Well you were glitching and using forcefield yesterday'
is also muteable.

 

In this case it's saying ' u were trying to glitch '
which indicates 'trying to' also in this case it's just a normal conversation with a normal question so no mutable accusations in my eyes.