»DutchxFaanaticZz- Admin {withholding data}

Well i was on Pvp walking around and one guy ''Just_1VS1_me''' start fighting me with fly ! we was flying around me i jump out and asked ''DutchxFaanaticZz'' check it out he came on pvp and we was just looking ban him after 5-10 min when i died and later continue dont give a @@@@ for me i dont like those guys he saw him segamiswolazopie was there too we were writting to DutchxFaanaticZz ban him but he was just statying and looking !!! i lose 1 set prot iv 3 gapples and a sword sharp iv fire 2 and looting 3 because DutchxFaanaticZz was looking and doesn't do his job !!!

 

@DutchxFanaticZz

 

u need to understand that i cant just ban someone just because players say he is hacking i need to check stuff and try to get evidance so if he makes a unban request i have the proof to keep him banned.
i also recommend u not to harass and threaten me or any other staff cus thats not the way to get me to help u faster.

 

you was just staying and looking !! you was talking on chat....... tell me how many times i asked you to came check !!! a lot and what did you do ''yea yea you need profs'' he was flying and hitting us'' banneble he cant proof the opposite

 

please dont make up new parts of the story
when i noticed it was about a hacker i came instantly i didnt say anything in chat cus i was trying to get proof cus i HAVE to be able to proof why i banned someone if i randomly ban people and say "some player said he was hacking" i will lose my rank.

 

I'm sorry, but since when did you join an arbitration club?
Look, admins can't ban with just "see with eyes" proof. If the banned players created an unban request, that creates problems. It's not as easy as banning a player as you think; Hack detector evidence is required + video evidence. It's definitely not that simple to just ban a player without perfect proof, especially for fly hacks.

On the other hand, it is also your job to provide evidence. Admins cannot catch up with everything - they have different issues to take care of. At the least of what you could have done was record, although that's not enforced I won't comment on that, but what me and Dutch are trying to say here is that it is NOT allowed to ban hackers w/o evidence, regardless of how much they hack.

Restating, you can't demand staff members to ban people without evidence; he was in the middle of trying to acquire it - meaning that we can't ban with full evidence.