Sometimes I give some suggestions or if I report a player, an administrator comes and says not a good idea or not enough evidence and locks the post. Don't even give a chance to explain more? It feels like this- Me: eh! I think world download should be there after reset? Etmin : Nah not good idea. U will steal it and put on ur server. [locked] It feels like he zipped my mouth Another storie Me: xyz has another account (posted screenshot) Etmin: more evidence required (locked) Where do u think I will give u more evidence? Ffs I can't post here. If I make new thread maybe they give me warning point for spamming same shat. I just feel like locking post (post that are not pointless) without reaching the answer or without reaching the finale shouldn't be locked. It feels like - Admin : Hehe now u try to speak! Lololol just try to post more here u nub. Omg yes I'm the king of GC. Don't dare to threat my friend. Disclaimer : Admins are good. They are cute unicorns. They are awesome(very awesome) . I'm not hurting their feelings. Hope this doesn't get locked.
If they say more evidences is need, they should give the reporter like 2-3 days to provide more evidences before they lock the thread
When they say "Not enough evidence" in the reports thread, they suppose you have provided all the important evidence you have, which you should in the first place. And you are always welcome to make a brand new report with all the evidence you have if it has been locked. Suggestion & Feed backs are not supposed to be locked unless it is totally off topic. I have never seen one being locked without a reason. Your case may be a needle in a haystack but then again, you have not revealed what exactly had happened. Just scroll over the pages of suggestions, you will see how many have been locked. They are left opened because the suggestions are more often that not debatable and they should remain so until they are implemented/improved or rejected if you say so.
I think this suggestion should be a rule for admins/player admin and that things i think you are right maybe there should be a board and it will be called Admin+ forum rules and one of them will be do not lock Threads if theres no enough evidence and admins/player admins etc.. should tell you not enough evidence not not enough eveidence and Lock it without leaving you tell your part about your opinion personaly thanks for your suggestion soon maybe i'll tell @aXed about that to make a board named for admins+ forum rules Thankyou for your suggestion ~ ToXiC_ and as @finaldestiny said you can make a new report with new evidence BUT the important thing is you don't spam [make 3 and more reports] Cheers
Crykas is just being an idiot he always says I act like an admin, when I never do. Also he thinks I disagree with every suggestion when I don't, he is an idiot and he knows it
One more example is this http://guildcraft.org/threads/eula-chorus-fruit-bad-staff-and-corrupt-players.15726/ It was a viewpoint about staff and semi and got locked.
In my opinion, I suggest to give the reporter permission to lock/unlock his thread. So, only the admins and the reporter (Who made the report) could lock/unlock it. Otherwize, if the reporter wants to provide another/extra evidence, so he just unlocks the topic and provides the proof as well. Another solution, as the admins above said, you are always allowed to post new reports with an evidence and we'll deal with them as well. But be careful, spamming with reports (4-5 reports in a row) is not allowed. I advise you to do what I did when I was a member, mix and make a fusion of all the reports i wanna post in one topic. It's much easier for staff to deal with it. Other than that, I would like to thank you for making this suggestion @lolwarmaze. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Best regards. -Dan.
To be honest I don't think it should be only reports. I think anyone who's created a thread in Suggestions, or places like trade center, or off-topic should simply be able to lock it on their own. Mainly because tagging an admin for the 10+ trades that occur in a day or even a week so to say, is kind of a waste of time for admins, let alone the fact that those 10 minutes could help someone get someone else banned. Also off-topic and suggestions because like here, there are times, though this isn't one of them, where the thread was taken the entirely wrong way and thus if the owner finds it pointless, and sees useless arguing to the point where the suggestion sort of dulled out, there can be an option to lock it instead of having to wait for an admin, because usually arguments occur back to back [Within 1-5 minutes of replies instantly] thus tagging an admin at that point would be useless because most arguments only last 10-15 minutes in those minutes they've basically spammed your entire thread and made it less "sharp"
@KinqCake I disagree that @CMCONCEPTS thread should be locked. She is trying to support Semi and express her view on what she thinks. I do not see any "inappropriate manner" which she has written in any of her threads. The ideas of players here need to be LISTENED TO rather than just: Player: "By implementing this-- this can be that! It would be a great idea! Admin: "No I dislike this. I dont agree therefore no other players can express their ideas in this post. -Locked" Without players, what do you think this server would be? Players like CMCONCEPTS are players who CARE for the server- players who have suggested, donated, and helped players in the server. Dont you understand that she is trying to express her own view without hating on all staff? By using your power to lock a thread I do not agree that you can use it to lock a GOOD WRITTEN thread. There are differences on what type of thread SHOULD and SHOULD NOT be locked. Bad thread: "All admins should be demoted!" Context: Admins suck i hate them they should be demoted. ^This type of thread should be locked. The certain player is being toxic towards staff members. Good thread: "Suggestion for the server." Context: Hi! Im player123 and i have playing this server for a year and i bought titan yesterday. i like this server and i want to help it by ----" That type of thread^ is what CMCONCEPTS has written. The player might have harrassed a staff disrespectfully- but cmon. Where is the thing called "FREEDOM OF SPEECH"? Do you like it if someone locks your thread in which you have written for a long time to help the server ONLY to be locked by a player who has the power to do so? Once again I do not hate you @KinqCake. You have been a great admin but right now I am expressing my view towards your action on that certain post. With kind regards and effort- I wish that this thread is not locked by an admin because of "Disrespect towards staff member". I have put alot of honesty and effort towards writing this one post ONLY because I CARE FOR THE SERVER. Not to hate the people who support the server (Staff).
I do hope this thread will be replied with good suggestions and manner. Not with revolts from disrespectful players as I know how it feels to be sweared repeatedly.
I guess you were too lazy to read his thread. Seems like you didn't even notice that the thread was made to hurt and give a bad name against PapaBoom and moek which's not allowed. I had a good reason to lock that thread and I won't discuss with you why I locked it. You're really confusing me tho, You - Badthread: "All admins should be demoted!" Context: Admins suck i hate them they should be demoted. CMCONCEPTS - Badthread: "PapaBoom should be demoted" Context: I hate Papaboom and moek, they killed me and I reported them he should be demoted. "Do you like it if someone locks your thread in which you have written for a long time to help the server ONLY to be locked by a player who has the power to do so?" How writing bad stuff about head-admin and member is helping the server? you don't make any sense. "Good thread: "Suggestion for the server." Context: Hi! Im player123 and i have playing this server for a year and i bought titan yesterday. i like this server and i want to help it by ----" That type of thread^ is what CMCONCEPTS has written. The player might have harrassed a staff disrespectfully- but cmon. Where is the thing called "FREEDOM OF SPEECH"?" This is not even close to look like CMCONCEPTS's thread, sorry but you won't have the freedom of speech when you insult our head-admins. Pssssssssssssstttttttttttt I will give you a little sign why he made that thread - http://guildcraft.org/members/cmconcepts.264/#profile-post-9980 http://guildcraft.org/threads/papaboom128.15625/#post-108234 http://guildcraft.org/threads/playe...kill-players-in-safe-homes.15623/#post-108161 http://guildcraft.org/threads/moek-papa-boom.15609/#post-108117 Funny how you accuse us the admins for locking threads with no reason when you don't even have an example or proof of admin doing that, may you please give us some examples where admin locking a thread with no reason so we can have an actual real discussion. You actually had a good reason there, admin always have a reason when they locks a thread and you even wrote the reason "You will abuse it, steal it to use it on your own server" Why do you think aXed would give someone his own lobbies/spawns that was made by GC builders away so easily ? there's always a reason why we reject those stupid suggestions because it's so obvious that people gonna use them in a bad way. "Me: xyz has another account (posted screenshot) Etmin: more evidence required (locked) Where do u think I will give u more evidence? Ffs I can't post here. If I make new thread maybe they give me warning point for spamming same shat. Now you're just making excuses, you won't receive any warnings unless you make 4 threads with the same post at the same time on purpose. Imagine I report aXed for banning me with "no reason", I report aXed, he locks the thread and gives me a good reason and explains why he banned me. but I refuse to understand because I only want to get unbanned and I don't care about anything, so I unlock the thread and start spamming the thread, I'm unstoppable nobody can lock my thread so I can spam forever. The unlock/lock thingy is kinda pointless and not needed when you let the members unlock/lock their own posts.
@KinqCake Ok, I understand what you mean. I do not hate you or dislike you in anyway so I apologize if I have hurt or disrespect you in anyway. Have a great day Cake
@KinqCake Following story is a hypothesis of what an administrator like you does. Me : eh! Someone scammed me. I told the admin (xyz admin) but he didn't help me. KinqCake : How dare you talk about an admin like that? Admins are our God. You can't say bad about our admin. This is dictatorship. AXED is our ruler and we Admins are law inforcement. No one can talk bad about us. We will ban u if we don't get the deserved respect. Me : well then why is there a suggestion forum when u don't need a suggestion. KinqCake: You can suggest about the server. But don't dare to suggest about Admins. We are perfect. We are idols. Don't hurt my ego. Me: is there any admin who cares about this server. Good admin like Toxic/axed/amethyst and many more : I apologize on behalf of KinqCake. Sorry for the inconvenience. You are allowed to post up viewpoint. That's why we made a suggestion forum. What KinqCake doesn't get is that we (the members) of guildcraft are here to improve our server together and if we need to improve an admin or rule then we will becoz we love this server as much as Admins do. Some Admins get this. Some of them are like- eh it's OK but would be better if u didn't say anything about administration. Don't be butthurt. Take it positively. #makeguildcraftgreatagain
What is your suggestion ? You are being sarcastic and nothing else. I get the part where your feedback is not positive.
Let's be straight Make some rules that locking should be done only when conclusion is reached or if people are just spamming stupid things. The person who makes the thread should have power to lock/unlock his own post. That's it Have a nice day
This actually made me laugh tho, funny how you keep making up stories and accusing me or other admins again when you still didn't give me even one example ( with link ) where admin actually did this. Keep making up stories, you ain't going to get no where like that Or maybe you afraid to admit the fact that this never actually happened before. "Some Admins get this. Some of them are like- eh it's OK but would be better if u didn't say anything about administration." I would get this if you give us a real proof that admin actually did this, if you don't have or you can't find on then this thread is pointless. Keep being sarcastic and I won't be surprised if this thread gets locked if you keep making up those stories. Again giving the power to the member to lock/unlock his posts would mess up everything, I already gave an example, and if u refuse to read it then it's your problem.
First of all this is not a report. This is also not a fight. This is a feedback This is my experience over the year. I'm not accusing you or any other admin. This is suggestion and feedback forum and this is a feedback. If u don't like it. It's ok My feedback is based on 100s of post that I have read and some that I mentioned were posted by me. If u are curios then go to profile and check the postings. What you don't understand is the difference between accusing and giving a general feedback. Feedback need not be positive. You had locked a post that said a lot about semi vanilla and chorus fruit being used to go into houses because you read a line where he abuses papaboom. That was just one line in the whole post. People were agreeing to the post and u stopped it. My real fight is with how locking works. My fight is not with admins. I don't even know you, why would I accuse u? Peace